1)
In summary, one of the US soldiers sent the
images of other US soldiers posing with dead afghan insurgents to news
agencies. The photos were very
controversial, even media analysts didn’t agree on whether it was the right
thing to publish the images. The
type of censorship it addresses is the act to censor violent and graphically
natural pictures that reflect a bad image of the US soldiers to their people.
The different positions presented are that, on one hand, media agencies found
that it was necessary - as the united states are big on freedom of speech –
that the public are aware of the unethical acts of the US soldier and the
occurring war. Of normality, the US defense department- the pentagon, found
that it would “cause needless casualties” and would ruin the reputation of the
US soldiers.
2)
As disturbing as the photographs may be, it is
of the public’s right that they are aware of the reckless behavior of these
soldiers, to understand what is happening exactly behind the scenes and
therefore the people can choose their stand on the issue. The USA have the
capability to vote for whether or not their citizens would like their soldiers
to carry on this war. If they are aware of what is going on, they could put a
stop to the war.
3)
Yes, free speech is a human right because every
person is responsible for what they say and do. In the regards to the United
States, the pentagon filter what and determine what information is available to
the public. How these determinations are made? It all depends on the image of
what is being presented gives to the USA. Since the USA is very big on freedom
of speech, media agencies did not take into consideration what the pentagon had
to say therefore went on and published the photographs.
4)
Censorship is such a controversial issue because
sometimes it is good to censor something that may protect the people from the negative
influence, but in the other hand, sometimes censoring does limit a person from
knowing what they should and have the right to know which makes this issue even
more controversial.
No comments:
Post a Comment