Friday, April 27, 2012
Suemya and Byanne's Censorship article Questions
Censoring twitter in Thailand -Rawda & Fatma :)
2) our opinion on this issue is that Thai people should have the right to express their thoughts on twitter just like other people from other countries. However Thai people should keep in mind that they have limits and should not tweet or publicize something against their government or country on twitter.
3) Yes, free speech is a human right because people should have the right to express their thoughts freely. The government and the people of the country should be the group that determines what information is promoted. And to prevent any minor problem in allowing the public to determine then the majorities' determination is what should be taken into consideration by the government. The role of the media is to send out a certain message or information to the public, depending on the nation, the certain agency might be granted the whole freedom to provide any information to the people, as some of them have limits. It is obvious and logical to pass information the way it was taken yet this is not what is happening in the media today.
4) As mentioned in the article, in China, the state-run Global Times also endorsed in an article, "it is impossible to have boundless freedom, even on the internet and even in countries that make freedom their main selling point," it stated. Therefore, we can see that different countries have different goals and priorities. Some governments think that a person's freedom is the most important thing and that this right shouldn't be taken away from the people. However, other countries think that the protection of their government and leader is the most important thing and this leads them into taking actions such as censoring what the citizens of the country say.
An over view of the article states that Iran is banning the Simpsons because they do not want their culture to be affected by the western society. In addition their goal is to not influence the younger generation with the western society. For example the article mentions the babie doll that is banned in iran simply because the children are not allowed to play with such figures that have their body exposed with tight cloths, but instead would let their children play with baggy cloths.
2) What is your opinion on the censorship issue raised in the article? Explain your position.
We think this is an example of one of Iran's religious based regulations that is known throughout the world as it was seen that the simpsons for them is considered an innapropriate show to be shown on TV, therefore we think that people should respect Iran's regulations because the residences have been following these regulations for a long period of time.
3) As we saw in the debate, policies on censorship range widely in different countries. Several fundamental questions about censorship came up such as:
Is free speech a human right?
Definefetly free speech is a human right all around the world but this "human right" varies from country to country. Some countries such as America, UK, and Sweden have much more freedom of speech where as other countries such as Iran and DPR Korea still do have freedom of speech but to less extends when compared to other western countries.
Who has the right to determine what information is available to the public and how are those
determinations made?
In most countries information gets montiored by the government and at that stage the information that is inappropriate gets censored and the information that does not harm the country and its people get to be displayed.
What is the role of the media and to what extent is it obligated to provide information to the public?
Now days media is the voice of the people, and people try to be heard through media. Although media is a really strong weapon, many governments censor the most things that may harm them or their reputation so that the people wouldn't go wild and start a riot.
What fundamental issues do you see raised by your article about free speech and censorship?
As read in the article the only reason why Iran banned the Simpsons was because the government did not want their people to be influenced by the western culture and society. To Iran, being influenced by other countries was always a big issue and it still is hence they are banning the simpsons shows and toys from Iran.
4) Why do you think censorship is such a controversial issue?
Censorship is a controversial issue due to the fact that goverments of all countries always try to hide what is happening behind the scene because they know that if the residence of the country found out about it, they would be very bad. Also in some countries such as Iran they try to avoide any influences by the western society because they do not want to become like them, although to many of us that may seem very weird.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Al Jazeera Articles
1) http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/04/2012424171319480942.html
2) http://www.aljazeera.com/video/europe/2012/04/201242455722955950.html
Censorship Article Answers - Oswin & Zaza
Sara&Sheikha's Answers Thing :)
Sara&Sheikha's Answers to censorship
Mjölnir's Copy/Poppy Queries - By Matt the Magnificent and Paul the Irrepressible
- The article talks about could have negative effects on society, and WikiLeaks can really be prosecuted legally. It also mentions past attempts to prosecute news sources that rather than procuring illegal things reprinted them when they were given to them as a source, accusing them of colluding with the theif and activly trying to procure the items. At the end, the speaker takes a very critical position when descriping President Obama.
- The main issue we have is disagreeing over whether it's legal/fair for WikiLeaks to be prosocuted for publishing the stolen material, as other groups haven't been prosecuted in such manner in the past. We're arguing over whether WikiLeaks is just publishing whatever's given to it, regardless of whether it's stolen, and that they're just trying to find a roundabout way to censor the press or if WikiLeaks essentially promotes stealing information from governments and should be prevented from doing this, as to not promote violating theft laws.
- Free speech has really been defined so many times by different people in different ways, so it doesn't really mean anything anymore, and it really isn't a 'human right', since one can't really define what a 'human right' is, since standards of 'rights' and what's permissible or not are always changing. Nobody really has the 'right' do define what's allowed to reach the public and what isn't, but more of a matter of who has power at that time, and what do they want to do with it. Media again, is just another display of somebody having power, and deciding what they feel their job is and what they want to say. Essentially, the media can't be obligated to do anything by the public, and it just does what the rich person who owns it tells them to do. The article raises the question with censorship of whether probable cause is a reason to censor something.
- It isn't clear cut or definable, and it prevents people from getting information which may alter their decisions. Also, it questions how far governments can reach and control their citizens, and effect the paradox of people hating their government controlling them but not wanting to be left doing things 'all by themselves'.
Barack Obama Slow Jams the News
I've seen this video posted all over Facebook and I think it relates to some of the things we've been talking about in the course. It's a great example of politicians using media and social networking in innovative ways in order to target specific audiences and inspire political action. Take a look at the issue being addressed, the target audience, and the way the message is constructed and distributed. Comment on these issues for extra blog points.
Barackness monster! Bwa ha ha : )
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Must Anything Ever Really be Said
Of course, it led to a lot of people throwing fits since well, he's German, and was kind of (fine not kind of) a member of Waffen-SS as a teenager in WWII, which he'd previously left out of his memoirs and speaking about his past, until essentially being forced to. Thus, people have said that it's hypocritical for him to tell Germany to face their past when he refuses to face his. At the same time, many people, inside and outside of Germany are starting to share his view that Germany should no longer handicap itself because of mistakes people's grandparents made.
Here are a couple link to a translations of the poem. One has it in only English, and the other site has a plethora of languages, including Arabic.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
The English Language,
Have you ever wondered why foreigners have trouble with the English Language?
Let's face it
English is a stupid language.
There is no egg in the eggplant
No ham in the hamburger
And neither pine nor apple in the pineapple.
English muffins were not invented in England
French fries were not invented in France.
We sometimes take English for granted
But if we examine its paradoxes we find that
Quicksand takes you down slowly
Boxing rings are square
And a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.
If writers write, how come fingers don't fing.
If the plural of tooth is teeth
Shouldn't the plural of phone booth be phone beeth
If the teacher taught,
Why didn't the preacher praught.
If a vegetarian eats vegetables
What the heck does a humanitarian eat!?
Why do people recite at a play
Yet play at a recital?
Park on driveways and
Drive on parkways
You have to marvel at the unique lunacy
Of a language where a house can burn up as
It burns down
And in which you fill in a form
By filling it out
And a bell is only heard once it goes!
English was invented by people, not computers
And it reflects the creativity of the human race
(Which of course isn't a race at all)
That is why
When the stars are out they are visible
But when the lights are out they are invisible
And why it is that when I wind up my watch
It starts
But when I wind up this observation,
It ends.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
1) Identify or choose a concept which we understand through metaphor
Life is a journey
2) List all the phrases/expressions this metaphor
She travelled a long way in her life
On the road to success
She went (she died)
She came to this/she arrived at this (got to this stage in life)
The baby arrived at this time on this day
I have no direction in life
One must move on
3) Explain the way this particular metaphor structures our perceptions
A journey is one that does not necessarily have an end, or perhaps in better wording, does not have an end in the eyes of the person travelling, when they begin travelling. Life in many ways is similar to that, one does not know when their life will end and neither do they know what their life will bring. This metaphor is therefore valid and helps people all over the world bring the meaning of life closer to others around them, since everyone can relate to what a journey is.
4) Imagine a different way of conceptualizing this topic- or identify the similarities and differences in another language. How would that change our perception?
Life is a global privilege that people all over the world value, or should value, greatly. It is one thing to understand what life is, but another to live it. For that reason, many cultures and languages around the world have adopted this metaphor in their own ways. For example, Arabic also uses the same metaphor and similar connotations for different parts of life.
English Questions – Page 101
In what ways do the articles above celebrate language diversity?
2) Are the articles critical of language diversity? Language blending? Language change?
No, they are not. I personally thought they did very well in portraying the positives of language diversity, but appeared to be biased, since they did not give their audiences both sides of the story at hand. They both proposed new innovations that language diversity can be incorporated in, not mentioning any limitations of the diversity of language.
3) What are the possible reasons for people who ‘code switch’ to feel self-conscious about using language combinations in public?
The most common reason is that they thing that if they do not do that ‘code-switch’, they will essentially be made fun of by the people who surround them, making them feel embarrassed. Furthermore, feeling like the odd one out within a group is not a favoured feeling, it is best for one to feel that they are like the rest of their friends, so that they enjoy their time with them without feeling left out.
4) Why would linguists be interested in studying language change?
It was mentioned in the articles that language change could have significantly affect both culture and the way that language is perceived and consequently taught. Language change is therefore extremely interesting, not only because of its effects, but also in the way that it changes.
5) What are the possible reasons for wanting to slow or stop the change of language use in a particular country?
Possible reasons include wanting to stick to the true identity of a country in the sense that language change could potentially hinder the value that the true identity of a country has. In addition, it is important to recognise that different generations have been affected by language change both at different levels and different times, leading to the changes varying from one generation to another.
6) How should public education, in a given country, handle the instruction of the dominant native language? How should educators approach language variations?
Personally, I think that when a language is taught, it should be taught in its classic form, therefore without any changes to it depending on language change. An example of this is the Arabic language, when it is taught, it is taught in its classical form, where all dialects are put to a side, obliging students to be able to communicate, write and read fluently in that particular form of Arabic. The reason why language should not be taught in their changed forms is because a language is special because of its own characteristics, when these characteristics intertwine with others and are tweaked, the language loses the identity and value it once had.
Language!
English Blog Questions:
What time period are many of these words from? Why do you think so many words come from this time?
From the time where the Ottoman Empire was around, this is when a lot of cultural diffusion was happening, which lead to the spreading of words through trade and means of colonisation.
What kinds of words has Arabic contributed to English?
Look at things like star names and medicine.
Many scientific words are part of the list of words that Arabic has contributed to English, and this is related to the Golden Ages, where the Arabs were able to discover and invent various items that acted as basics for other scientists to build upon.
How is a language a reflection of the history and culture of a civilisation?
The words used within a language are directly related to what the people speaking that language needed to express themselves, which essentially is their culture and history.
English Blog Other Questions:
What kinds of words is your generation adding to the dictionary?
Words that are commonly used in every-day conversation are therefore short words that have been derived from old words and created by the current generation. They therefore might not sometimes make sense to members of the previous generations.
Should these words be in the dictionary? Does it make a difference whether they are or not?
The way in which a dictionary is looked upon nowadays is that it is present to differentiate between what is proper English and what is slang. If however these new words become part of the dictionary, then they will be considered formal English, which is not what billions of people around the world are used to. It will make a difference when it comes to formal writing and communication, but will not have an effect on casual day-to-day conversation, since those types of conversations do not concern themselves with dictionaries and the words in them.
Are there contemporary words you use, that are not reflected here?
They’re all mainly present on the website, but some of the common abbreviations are not. In addition, there are a number of emoticons which could count as words that have not been posted onto the website either.