Saturday, December 3, 2011
Response to Speeches
speech post
I thought Mikheils was the most persuasive
2) why? inspiring delivery? topic?
Firstly because he seemed to know what he was talking about so well without having to read the text or so much as look down. Then there was his humor that really connected with the audience specially because some of the jokes were very related to the audience he was talking to. It showed that he knew who he was talking to. Also he was the only person to walk around and seemed comfortable talking.
3) what did you do well?
I think I did quite well with my tone and speed. It was meant to come across as quite serious. The speed was slow but thats how I had intended to do it since the beginning partially because if I had gone any faster I would have had problems keeping up with myself.
4) what could you have done better?
There was some content I wanted to say that I missed out because I didn't look down at the text often enough to keep note of where I was in the speech. Also I didn't gesture nearly as much as I intended to and I would have preferred if I'd walked around.
Speech Responses
- What speech did you think was most persuasive and why?
- What did you do well in yours?
- What could you have done better?
- Best speech. Overall, I think that everyone's speeches were good, and each person with their own style has their strengths and weaknesses. Also, since people tend to remember what they saw last, the people who presented on the last day have an advantage in this, just because it's fresher in my head. But if I had to pick one, I'd probably say that Sheikha's was the best, for a few reasons. The biggest was the way she was able to come across clearly, and show passion and that she cared about the issue. Also, she used literary techniques well, like rethorical questions.
- Pretty much nothing. I didn't fall asleep while presenting it, and that's about it.
- Everything. I've given better useless speeches about Kool-Aid than this. With my speech, I hadn't memorized much of my speech, and had so spend way too much time looking down at my speech instead of up at the audience. Also, due to my lack of memorization of it, I wasn't really comfortable while speaking, and would go off on tangents freestyling and changing sections of it on the fly. Also, due to my head being stuck in the paper, I wasn't able to pay much attentioni to what I was doing with my hands gesturing, or how I was standing, so I wasn't really able to use my posture the way I'd planned to to puncuate points that I was making. In my verbal delivery of it, there really wasn't much passion or strength in what I was saying, and I wasn't able to hold the floor, or control the room like I should've been. With the speech itself, the biggest of the several weaknesses was the ending. There really wasn't an ending, since I just said a bunch of vauge things about MUN or whatever while I was making it up. Though it was an issue that contains a lot of emotional and moral arguments, I didn't feed off of that in my writing. I should've used more contrasts and examples in my speech. I also needed to have a wider range of persuasive techniques, like tying it to how famous Nigerians have refused awards from the governement because of how bad the issue is, having anecdotes, or such things. I also didn't have any memorable line. There wasn't an abstract hook at the begining to get everyone's attention because they're confused, or a power line that is memorable, sonorus, and can summarize the speech in one sentence. And that's proabaly skipping a few things I can't think of right now.
About The Speeches
Which speed did you find the most persuasive? What about the speech made it persuasive? Inspire delivery? Relevant topic? Strong rhetoric?
I found Mikhail’s speech the most persuasive out of all. I found it the most persuasive because of his use of relevance, humour, tone, body language and contact with the audience.
Mikhail’s topic was something we deal with on a daily basis, it’s relevant and we can all relate to it. When speaking about his issue, he used things we all understood and know. By using things that are relevant, it allows the speaker to connect with the audience, which he did really well.
His use of humour was fantastic. It kept the audience interested and it wasn’t forced. It was well time and well pulled off. I think he was the only person to use humour in their speech. It’s amazing how effective it was. His tone was quite calm but still very persuasive. It didn’t stay monotonous, every strong point he made, his voice and tone changed to match it.
I was amazed by his body language and eye contact. Mikhail was able to walk around the room, yet still command the attention. He didn’t move his arms around a lot, but when he did, it added to what he said. He barely looked at his paper. Maybe once he looked. It was amazing. Also, his body language was quite open and so it was as if he was open to anyone’s opinion and thus making him approachable.
Mikhail also didn’t overuse metaphors. When he used them, they were appropriate and strong. I was defiantly blown away by what Mikhail had to say.
What do you think you did well in your speech?
Honestly, I don’t know what I did well. I don’t really remember doing my speech. I can only really remember the things I thought I didn’t do well in.
What do you think you could have done better?
I could have done a lot of things better. I barely moved as I was afraid that if I started to move, I would lose my train of thought and freeze. I also went really fast during my speech. I get nervous when I speak to people and the thought from my brain pauses before making it to my mouth. It doesn’t matter how much I know something, I’ll always stumble over my words. I could have probably also have used more literary figures to make it sound that much better.
Speech Blog Post
Response to speech presentations
SPEECH RESPONSES BLOG ENTRY
2) Question ONE pretty much answered this question, but I would like to add on more about the literary and rhetorical techniques that Khalil used in his speech. There were quite a few powerful metaphors used in the speech. But, the most powerful and extraordinary metaphor was the one about "Making a deal with the angel of death and end up paying him in misery". This was probably the climax of Khalil's speech and had a very strong effect on me which completely convinced me to support his cause. The topic was also very relevant in today's society. The reasons behind it controversy are no further than basic human ethics and nature of our emotions.
3) I think the best thing that I did in my speech was the use of humour that kept the audience with me throughout the speech and the numerous list of advantages that the uniforms brought to the wearer, which according to Ms Dellapa, was close to brainwashing the audience into supporting my cause.
4) The first thing I could have done to improve my speech is NOT to break into laughter half way through it. Ok, now lets look at some serious improvements. Next time, I would like to increase the number of literary techniques used in my speech. Even though I had a few, I feel a necessity of having more. Second of all, I would like to touch on more rhetorical devices. My speech about uniforms was mostly Logos based, therefore I would like to bring more Ethos and Pathos into my work the next time.